Areas for improvement: Nothing - so far
Subaru finally listened to its customers and has lengthened the Forester to add almost 4 inches of legroom for the back passengers. They maintained the fantastic fuel economy while increasing horsepower and torque slightly. This car is quieter, more comfortable and spacious than previous Forester models. They also lowered the price from last year!
Did I mention that it is incredibly smooth and fun to drive?
I owned the 97 Forester and kept it for 3 years before I had to get rid of it because the leg room in the back was prohibitive for my then 7 year old daughter. Other than that, the 97 Forester, while being a bit homely, was a flawless performer. This included as far as reliability went as well.
When I heard the 2009 would increase the leg room, I immediately went out and drove one. Much to my surprise Subaru completely redesigned the car inside and out, as well as in the suspension, and with changes to the mechanical features also. The back seat has plenty of room for me and my long-legged family to sit in comfort with room to spare before our knees touch the back of the front seats in the fully pushed back position.
They also now allow the back seats to recline 4 inches back (the earlier models' suspension did not allow for this).
The overall size is slightly larger while holding on to it's "car" status (which really helps with insurance costs).
The reliability of the Forester (still built in Japan) has been constantly in the "above average" category and I expect this one to be the same.
I will post more as we put more miles on it, but I am delighted to have the privilege of posting the first review of the 2009 Subaru Forester.
The running costs for Subaru Forester 2.5L 4 cylinder Automatic are normal
Other Subaru Forester
Related car reviews
Review Subaru Forester 2.5L 4 cylinder Automatic 2008
Subaru finally listened to its customers and has lengthened the Forester to add almost 4 inches of legroom for the back passengers. They maintained th...
Submitted by shawn22
Review Acura MDX Automatic 2005
My MDX is great, but I wish it used regular fuel. The acceleration is only slightly better than the Pilot, which burns 87 octane. I'm a tall guy an...
Submitted by greg222
Review Ford Explorer 4.0L V6 Automatic 2005
They redesigned the Explorer for this year and it is much better than the older 2002-2005 version like my relatives had. They updated the suspension a...
Submitted by yangeroo
Review Acura MDX 3.5L V6 Automatic 2006
My MDX is great. The acceleration is only slightly better than the Pilot, which burns 87 octane.I'm a tall chap and the low roof line over the door op...
Submitted by shawn22


